↓ Skip to main content

Update on antibiotic resistance in foodborne Lactobacillus and Lactococcus species

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Update on antibiotic resistance in foodborne Lactobacillus and Lactococcus species
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00301
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chiara Devirgiliis, Paola Zinno, Giuditta Perozzi

Abstract

Lactobacilli represent a major Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) component within the complex microbiota of fermented foods obtained from meat, dairy, and vegetable sources. Lactococci, on the other hand, are typical of milk and fermented dairy products, which in turn represent the vast majority of fermented foods. As is the case for all species originating from the environment, foodborne lactobacilli and lactococci consist of natural, uncharacterized strains, whose biodiversity depends on geographical origin, seasonality, animal feeding/plant growth conditions. Although a few species of opportunistic pathogens have been described, lactobacilli and lactococci are mostly non-pathogenic, Gram-positive bacteria displaying probiotic features. Since antibiotic resistant (AR) strains do not constitute an immediate threat to human health, scientific interest for detailed studies on AR genes in these species has been greatly hindered. However, increasing evidence points at a crucial role for foodborne LAB as reservoir of potentially transmissible AR genes, underlining the need for further, more detailed studies aimed at identifying possible strategies to avoid AR spread to pathogens through fermented food consumption. The availability of a growing number of sequenced bacterial genomes has been very helpful in identifying the presence/distribution of mobile elements associated with AR genes, but open questions and knowledge gaps still need to be filled, highlighting the need for systematic and datasharing approaches to implement both surveillance and mechanistic studies on transferability of AR genes. In the present review we report an update of the recent literature on AR in lactobacilli and lactococci following the 2006 EU-wide ban of the use of antibiotics as feed additives in animal farming, and we discuss the limits of the present knowledge in evaluating possible risks for human health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 235 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 17%
Researcher 32 13%
Student > Master 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 64 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 3%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 82 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2014.
All research outputs
#5,972,875
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#5,689
of 24,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,663
of 280,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#86
of 407 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 407 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.