The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Characterization of the genetic environment of blaESBL genes, integrons and toxin-antitoxin systems identified on large transferrable plasmids in multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00716 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Juan Wang, Roger Stephan, Katrin Zurfluh, Herbert Hächler, Séamus Fanning |
Abstract |
Previously 14 conjugative plasmids from multi-drug resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli from healthy humans and food-producing animals in Switzerland were sequenced. The aim of this study was to extend the genetic characterization of these plasmids with a focus on bla ESBL genes including bla CTX-M-1 and bla TEM, class 1 integrons and toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems contained therein. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
India | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 89 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 32% |
Researcher | 12 | 13% |
Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 19% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 20 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2015.
All research outputs
#17,736,409
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#17,088
of 24,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,497
of 352,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#187
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.