↓ Skip to main content

Heterologous production of fungal secondary metabolites in Aspergilli

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heterologous production of fungal secondary metabolites in Aspergilli
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00077
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana Chinyere Anyaogu, Uffe Hasbro Mortensen

Abstract

Fungal natural products comprise a wide range of compounds. Some are medically attractive as drugs and drug leads, some are used as food additives, while others are harmful mycotoxins. In recent years the genome sequence of several fungi has become available providing genetic information of a large number of putative biosynthetic pathways. However, compound discovery is difficult as the genes required for the production of the compounds often are silent or barely expressed under laboratory conditions. Furthermore, the lack of available tools for genetic manipulation of most fungal species hinders pathway discovery. Heterologous expression of the biosynthetic pathway in model systems or cell factories facilitates product discovery, elucidation, and production. This review summarizes the recent strategies for heterologous expression of fungal biosynthetic pathways in Aspergilli.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 4 2%
United States 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 206 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 26%
Student > Master 37 17%
Student > Bachelor 35 16%
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Postgraduate 9 4%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 25%
Chemistry 11 5%
Chemical Engineering 8 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 38 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,211,150
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,650
of 24,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,474
of 357,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#95
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.