↓ Skip to main content

NADPH-generating systems in bacteria and archaea

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
267 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
636 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
NADPH-generating systems in bacteria and archaea
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00742
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastiaan K. Spaans, Ruud A. Weusthuis, John van der Oost, Servé W. M. Kengen

Abstract

Reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) is an essential electron donor in all organisms. It provides the reducing power that drives numerous anabolic reactions, including those responsible for the biosynthesis of all major cell components and many products in biotechnology. The efficient synthesis of many of these products, however, is limited by the rate of NADPH regeneration. Hence, a thorough understanding of the reactions involved in the generation of NADPH is required to increase its turnover through rational strain improvement. Traditionally, the main engineering targets for increasing NADPH availability have included the dehydrogenase reactions of the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway and the isocitrate dehydrogenase step of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. However, the importance of alternative NADPH-generating reactions has recently become evident. In the current review, the major canonical and non-canonical reactions involved in the production and regeneration of NADPH in prokaryotes are described, and their key enzymes are discussed. In addition, an overview of how different enzymes have been applied to increase NADPH availability and thereby enhance productivity is provided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 636 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 627 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 129 20%
Student > Master 103 16%
Researcher 92 14%
Student > Bachelor 61 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 5%
Other 78 12%
Unknown 142 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 196 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 133 21%
Chemistry 22 3%
Engineering 20 3%
Chemical Engineering 18 3%
Other 71 11%
Unknown 176 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,578,356
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#6,726
of 25,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,622
of 264,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#89
of 363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.