↓ Skip to main content

Chemosensitization of multidrug resistant Candida albicans by the oxathiolone fused chalcone derivatives

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chemosensitization of multidrug resistant Candida albicans by the oxathiolone fused chalcone derivatives
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00783
Pubmed ID
Authors

Izabela Ła̧cka, Marek T. Konieczny, Anita Bułakowska, Marie Kodedová, Dana Gašková, Indresh K. Maurya, Rajendra Prasad, Sławomir Milewski

Abstract

Three structurally related oxathiolone fused chalcone derivatives appeared effective chemosensitizers, able to restore in part sensitivity to fluconazole of multidrug-resistant C. albicans strains. Compound 21 effectively chemosensitized cells resistant due to the overexpression of the MDR1 gene, compound 6 reduced resistance of cells overexpressing the ABC-type drug transporters CDR1/CDR2 and derivative 18 partially reversed fluconazole resistance mediated by both types of yeast drug efflux pumps. The observed effect of sensitization of resistant strains of Candida albicans to fluconazole activity in the presence of active compounds most likely resulted from inhibition of the pump-mediated efflux, as was revealed by the results of studies involving the fluorescent probes, Nile Red, Rhodamine 6G and diS-C3(3).

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Student > Master 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Mathematics 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2015.
All research outputs
#18,420,033
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#19,301
of 24,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,931
of 264,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#248
of 357 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 357 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.