Title |
Hydrological pulse regulating the bacterial heterotrophic metabolism between Amazonian mainstems and floodplain lakes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01054 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Luciana O. Vidal, Gwenäel Abril, Luiz F. Artigas, Michaela L. Melo, Marcelo C. Bernardes, Lúcia M. Lobão, Mariana C. Reis, Patrícia Moreira-Turcq, Marc Benedetti, Valdemar L. Tornisielo, Fabio Roland |
Abstract |
We evaluated in situ rates of bacterial carbon processing in Amazonian floodplain lakes and mainstems, during both high water (HW) and low water (LW) phases (p < 0.05). Our results showed that bacterial production (BP) was lower and more variable than bacterial respiration, determined as total respiration. Bacterial carbon demand was mostly accounted by BR and presented the same pattern that BR in both water phases. Bacterial growth efficiency (BGE) showed a wide range (0.2-23%) and low mean value of 3 and 6%, (in HW and LW, respectively) suggesting that dissolved organic carbon was mostly allocated to catabolic metabolism. However, BGE was regulated by BP in LW phase. Consequently, changes in BGE showed the same pattern that BP. In addition, the hydrological pulse effects on mainstems and floodplains lakes connectivity were found for BP and BGE in LW. Multiple correlation analyses revealed that indexes of organic matter (OM) quality (chlorophyll-a, N stable isotopes and C/N ratios) were the strongest seasonal drivers of bacterial carbon metabolism. Our work indicated that: (i) the bacterial metabolism was mostly driven by respiration in Amazonian aquatic ecosystems resulting in low BGE in either high or LW phase; (ii) the hydrological pulse regulated the bacterial heterotrophic metabolism between Amazonian mainstems and floodplain lakes mostly driven by OM quality. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 22% |
Researcher | 6 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 30% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 22% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 27% |