↓ Skip to main content

Metagenomic analysis of the rumen microbial community following inhibition of methane formation by a halogenated methane analog

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metagenomic analysis of the rumen microbial community following inhibition of methane formation by a halogenated methane analog
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01087
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart E. Denman, Gonzalo Martinez Fernandez, Takumi Shinkai, Makoto Mitsumori, Christopher S. McSweeney

Abstract

Japanese goats fed a diet of 50% Timothy grass and 50% concentrate with increasing levels of the anti-methanogenic compound, bromochloromethane (BCM) were investigated with respect to the microbial population and functional shifts in the rumen. Microbial ecology methods identified species that exhibited positive and negative responses to the increasing levels of BCM. The methane-inhibited rumen appeared to adapt to the higher H2 levels by shifting fermentation to propionate which was mediated by an increase in the population of H2-consuming Prevotella and Selenomonas spp. Metagenomic analysis of propionate production pathways was dominated by genomic content from these species. Reductive acetogenic marker gene libraries and metagenomics analysis indicate that reductive acetogenic species do not play a major role in the BCM treated rumen.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 138 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 26 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 6%
Environmental Science 8 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 38 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2015.
All research outputs
#13,506,756
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#10,049
of 25,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,852
of 280,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#173
of 440 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 440 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.