↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic Engineering of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 to Produce Anthranilate from Glucose

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolic Engineering of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 to Produce Anthranilate from Glucose
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01310
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jannis Kuepper, Jasmin Dickler, Michael Biggel, Swantje Behnken, Gernot Jäger, Nick Wierckx, Lars M. Blank

Abstract

The Pseudomonas putida KT2440 strain was engineered in order to produce anthranilate (oAB, ortho-aminobenzoate), a precursor of the aromatic amino acid tryptophan, from glucose as sole carbon source. To enable the production of the metabolic intermediate oAB, the trpDC operon encoding an anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase (TrpD) and an indole-3-glycerol phosphate synthase (TrpC), were deleted. In addition, the chorismate mutase (pheA) responsible for the conversion of chorismate over prephenate to phenylpyruvate was deleted in the background of the deletion of trpDC to circumvent a potential drain of precursor. To further increase the oAB production, a feedback insensitive version of 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate synthase encoded by the aroG (D146N) gene and an anthranilate synthase (trpE (S40F) G) were overexpressed separately and simultaneously in the deletion mutants. With optimized production conditions in a tryptophan-limited fed-batch process a maximum of 1.54 ± 0.3 g L(-1) (11.23 mM) oAB was obtained with the best performing engineered P. putida KT2440 strain (P. putida ΔtrpDC pSEVA234_aroG (D146N) _trpE (S40F) G).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 28%
Student > Master 12 16%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 22%
Chemical Engineering 6 8%
Engineering 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 21 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,963,366
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,275
of 24,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,170
of 386,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#120
of 424 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 424 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.