↓ Skip to main content

Streptomyces Bacteria as Potential Probiotics in Aquaculture

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Streptomyces Bacteria as Potential Probiotics in Aquaculture
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00079
Pubmed ID
Authors

Loh Teng-Hern Tan, Kok-Gan Chan, Learn-Han Lee, Bey-Hing Goh

Abstract

In response to the increased seafood demand from the ever-going human population, aquaculture has become the fastest growing animal food-producing sector. However, the indiscriminate use of antibiotics as a biological control agents for fish pathogens has led to the emergence of antibiotic resistance bacteria. Probiotics are defined as living microbial supplement that exert beneficial effects on hosts as well as improvement of environmental parameters. Probiotics have been proven to be effective in improving the growth, survival and health status of the aquatic livestock. This review aims to highlight the genus Streptomyces can be a good candidate for probiotics in aquaculture. Studies showed that the feed supplemented with Streptomyces could protect fish and shrimp from pathogens as well as increase the growth of the aquatic organisms. Furthermore, the limitations of Streptomyces as probiotics in aquaculture is also highlighted and solutions are discussed to these limitations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 215 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 17%
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Student > Master 23 11%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 64 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 4%
Environmental Science 8 4%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 74 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,703,715
of 26,490,075 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#8,927
of 30,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,652
of 410,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#176
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,490,075 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.