↓ Skip to main content

Cryptococcus and Phagocytes: Complex Interactions that Influence Disease Outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cryptococcus and Phagocytes: Complex Interactions that Influence Disease Outcome
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chrissy M. Leopold Wager, Camaron R. Hole, Karen L. Wozniak, Floyd L. Wormley

Abstract

Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii are fungal pathogens that cause life-threatening disease. These fungi commonly enter their host via inhalation into the lungs where they encounter resident phagocytes, including macrophages and dendritic cells, whose response has a pronounced impact on the outcome of disease. Cryptococcus has complex interactions with the resident and infiltrating innate immune cells that, ideally, result in destruction of the yeast. These phagocytic cells have pattern recognition receptors that allow recognition of specific cryptococcal cell wall and capsule components. However, Cryptococcus possesses several virulence factors including a polysaccharide capsule, melanin production and secretion of various enzymes that aid in evasion of the immune system or enhance its ability to thrive within the phagocyte. This review focuses on the intricate interactions between the cryptococci and innate phagocytic cells including discussion of manipulation and evasion strategies used by Cryptococcus, anti-cryptococcal responses by the phagocytes and approaches for targeting phagocytes for the development of novel immunotherapeutics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 21%
Student > Bachelor 24 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 16%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 30 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 30 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 12%
Chemistry 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 35 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,675,365
of 26,184,649 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#5,547
of 30,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,402
of 413,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#121
of 475 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,649 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 475 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.