↓ Skip to main content

Co-infections and Pathogenesis of KSHV-Associated Malignancies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Co-infections and Pathogenesis of KSHV-Associated Malignancies
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00151
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suhani Thakker, Subhash C. Verma

Abstract

Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), also known as human herpes virus 8 (HHV-8) is one of the several carcinogenic viruses that infect humans. KSHV infection has been implicated in the development of Kaposi's sarcoma (KS), primary effusion lymphoma, and multicentric Castleman's Disease. While KSHV infection is necessary for the development of KSHV associated malignancies, it is not sufficient to induce tumorigenesis. Evidently, other co-factors are essential for the progression of KSHV induced malignancies. One of the most important co-factors, necessary for the progression of KSHV induced tumors, is immune suppression that frequently arises during co-infection with HIV and also by other immune suppressants. In this mini-review, we discuss the roles of co-infection with HIV and other pathogens on KSHV infection and pathogenesis.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 18 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2016.
All research outputs
#14,248,391
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#12,435
of 24,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,428
of 403,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#291
of 534 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 534 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.