↓ Skip to main content

Surface Proteoglycans as Mediators in Bacterial Pathogens Infections

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surface Proteoglycans as Mediators in Bacterial Pathogens Infections
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00220
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beatriz García, Jesús Merayo-Lloves, Carla Martin, Ignacio Alcalde, Luis M. Quirós, Fernando Vazquez

Abstract

Infectious diseases remain an important global health problem. The interaction of a wide range of pathogen bacteria with host cells from many different tissues is frequently mediated by proteoglycans. These compounds are ubiquitous complex molecules which are not only involved in adherence and colonization, but can also participate in other steps of pathogenesis. To overcome the problem of microbial resistance to antibiotics new therapeutic agents could be developed based on the characteristics of the interaction of pathogens with proteoglycans.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 6 7%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 27 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Chemistry 4 5%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 30 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2016.
All research outputs
#18,443,697
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#19,363
of 24,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,988
of 298,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#400
of 515 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 515 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.