↓ Skip to main content

Gut Microbiota: The Brain Peacekeeper

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
480 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gut Microbiota: The Brain Peacekeeper
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00345
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chunlong Mu, Yuxiang Yang, Weiyun Zhu

Abstract

Gut microbiota regulates intestinal and extraintestinal homeostasis. Accumulating evidence suggests that the gut microbiota may also regulate brain function and behavior. Results from animal models indicate that disturbances in the composition and functionality of some microbiota members are associated with neurophysiological disorders, strengthening the idea of a microbiota-gut-brain axis and the role of microbiota as a "peacekeeper" in the brain health. Here, we review recent discoveries on the role of the gut microbiota in central nervous system-related diseases. We also discuss the emerging concept of the bidirectional regulation by the circadian rhythm and gut microbiota, and the potential role of the epigenetic regulation in neuronal cell function. Microbiome studies are also highlighted as crucial in the development of targeted therapies for neurodevelopmental disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 480 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 466 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 70 15%
Researcher 67 14%
Student > Master 67 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 11%
Student > Postgraduate 47 10%
Other 100 21%
Unknown 75 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 87 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 65 14%
Neuroscience 42 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 26 5%
Other 67 14%
Unknown 89 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,596,687
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#983
of 29,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,079
of 330,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#36
of 566 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 566 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.