↓ Skip to main content

Escherichia coli β-Lactamases: What Really Matters

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Escherichia coli β-Lactamases: What Really Matters
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00417
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priyanka Bajaj, Nambram S Singh, Jugsharan S Virdi

Abstract

Escherichia coli strains belonging to diverse pathotypes have increasingly been recognized as a major public health concern. The β-lactam antibiotics have been used successfully to treat infections caused by pathogenic E. coli. However, currently, the utility of β-lactams is being challenged severely by a large number of hydrolytic enzymes - the β-lactamases expressed by bacteria. The menace is further compounded by the highly flexible genome of E. coli, and propensity of resistance dissemination through horizontal gene transfer and clonal spread. Successful management of infections caused by such resistant strains requires an understanding of the diversity of β-lactamases, their unambiguous detection, and molecular mechanisms underlying their expression and spread with regard to the most relevant information about individual bacterial species. Thus, this review comprises first such effort in this direction for E. coli, a bacterial species known to be associated with production of diverse classes of β-lactamases. The review also highlights the role of commensal E. coli as a potential but under-estimated reservoir of β-lactamases-encoding genes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 319 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 51 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 14%
Student > Master 38 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Researcher 20 6%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 106 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 47 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 19 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 4%
Other 31 10%
Unknown 123 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,555,490
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#3,197
of 24,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,175
of 300,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#104
of 545 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 545 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.