↓ Skip to main content

Rhizosphere Microbiomes of European Seagrasses Are Selected by the Plant, But Are Not Species Specific

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rhizosphere Microbiomes of European Seagrasses Are Selected by the Plant, But Are Not Species Specific
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00440
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catarina Cúcio, Aschwin H. Engelen, Rodrigo Costa, Gerard Muyzer

Abstract

Seagrasses are marine flowering plants growing in soft-body sediments of intertidal and shallow sub-tidal zones. They play an important role in coastal ecosystems by stabilizing sediments, providing food and shelter for animals, and recycling nutrients. Like other plants, seagrasses live intimately with both beneficial and unfavorable microorganisms. Although much is known about the microbiomes of terrestrial plants, little is known about the microbiomes of seagrasses. Here we present the results of a detailed study on the rhizosphere microbiome of seagrass species across the North-eastern Atlantic Ocean: Zostera marina, Zostera noltii, and Cymodocea nodosa. High-resolution amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA genes showed that the rhizobiomes were significantly different from the bacterial communities of surrounding bulk sediment and seawater. Although we found no significant differences between the rhizobiomes of different seagrass species within the same region, those of seagrasses in different geographical locations differed strongly. These results strongly suggest that the seagrass rhizobiomes are shaped by plant metabolism, but not coevolved with their host. The core rhizobiome of seagrasses includes mostly bacteria involved in the sulfur cycle, thereby highlighting the importance of sulfur-related processes in seagrass ecosystems.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 210 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 21%
Researcher 37 17%
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 50 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 39%
Environmental Science 41 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 57 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,961,334
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,320
of 29,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,607
of 316,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#42
of 544 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 544 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.