The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bacterial Communities: Interactions to Scale
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01234 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Reed M. Stubbendieck, Carol Vargas-Bautista, Paul D. Straight |
| Abstract |
In the environment, bacteria live in complex multispecies communities. These communities span in scale from small, multicellular aggregates to billions or trillions of cells within the gastrointestinal tract of animals. The dynamics of bacterial communities are determined by pairwise interactions that occur between different species in the community. Though interactions occur between a few cells at a time, the outcomes of these interchanges have ramifications that ripple through many orders of magnitude, and ultimately affect the macroscopic world including the health of host organisms. In this review we cover how bacterial competition influences the structures of bacterial communities. We also emphasize methods and insights garnered from culture-dependent pairwise interaction studies, metagenomic analyses, and modeling experiments. Finally, we argue that the integration of multiple approaches will be instrumental to future understanding of the underlying dynamics of bacterial communities. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 7% |
| Peru | 1 | 7% |
| Finland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 642 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Panama | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 634 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 178 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 86 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 78 | 12% |
| Researcher | 70 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 5% |
| Other | 60 | 9% |
| Unknown | 135 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 161 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 124 | 19% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 67 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 26 | 4% |
| Engineering | 18 | 3% |
| Other | 82 | 13% |
| Unknown | 164 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,214,969
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,634
of 28,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,291
of 373,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#41
of 433 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 433 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.