The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Didymella bryoniae by Visual Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01372 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiefeng Yao, Pingfang Li, Jinghua Xu, Man Zhang, Runsheng Ren, Guang Liu, Xingping Yang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 20% |
Lecturer | 3 | 15% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 45% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,657,585
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#8,405
of 25,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,921
of 338,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#184
of 425 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 425 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.