↓ Skip to main content

Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard L. Hahnke, Jan P. Meier-Kolthoff, Marina García-López, Supratim Mukherjee, Marcel Huntemann, Natalia N. Ivanova, Tanja Woyke, Nikos C. Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk, Markus Göker

Abstract

The bacterial phylum Bacteroidetes, characterized by a distinct gliding motility, occurs in a broad variety of ecosystems, habitats, life styles, and physiologies. Accordingly, taxonomic classification of the phylum, based on a limited number of features, proved difficult and controversial in the past, for example, when decisions were based on unresolved phylogenetic trees of the 16S rRNA gene sequence. Here we use a large collection of type-strain genomes from Bacteroidetes and closely related phyla for assessing their taxonomy based on the principles of phylogenetic classification and trees inferred from genome-scale data. No significant conflict between 16S rRNA gene and whole-genome phylogenetic analysis is found, whereas many but not all of the involved taxa are supported as monophyletic groups, particularly in the genome-scale trees. Phenotypic and phylogenomic features support the separation of Balneolaceae as new phylum Balneolaeota from Rhodothermaeota and of Saprospiraceae as new class Saprospiria from Chitinophagia. Epilithonimonas is nested within the older genus Chryseobacterium and without significant phenotypic differences; thus merging the two genera is proposed. Similarly, Vitellibacter is proposed to be included in Aequorivita. Flexibacter is confirmed as being heterogeneous and dissected, yielding six distinct genera. Hallella seregens is a later heterotypic synonym of Prevotella dentalis. Compared to values directly calculated from genome sequences, the G+C content mentioned in many species descriptions is too imprecise; moreover, corrected G+C content values have a significantly better fit to the phylogeny. Corresponding emendations of species descriptions are provided where necessary. Whereas most observed conflict with the current classification of Bacteroidetes is already visible in 16S rRNA gene trees, as expected whole-genome phylogenies are much better resolved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 293 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 20%
Researcher 40 13%
Student > Master 40 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 42 14%
Unknown 68 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 62 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 7%
Environmental Science 20 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 3%
Other 27 9%
Unknown 73 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,306,818
of 25,364,603 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#5,226
of 29,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,084
of 422,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#140
of 408 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,603 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 408 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.