The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluating the Contribution of Gut Microbiota to the Variation of Porcine Fatness with the Cecum and Fecal Samples
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02108 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maozhang He, Shaoming Fang, Xiaochang Huang, Yuanzhang Zhao, Shanlin Ke, Hui Yang, Zhuojun Li, Jun Gao, Congying Chen, Lusheng Huang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
Researcher | 12 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 33% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 18% |
Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,097,653
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4,068
of 24,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,357
of 420,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#121
of 402 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 402 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.