↓ Skip to main content

A Few Pseudomonas Oligotypes Dominate in the Meat and Dairy Processing Environment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Few Pseudomonas Oligotypes Dominate in the Meat and Dairy Processing Environment
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00264
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuseppina Stellato, Daniel R. Utter, Andy Voorhis, Maria De Angelis, A. Murat Eren, Danilo Ercolini

Abstract

The occurrence of bacteria in the food processing environments plays a key role in food contamination and development of spoilage. Species of the genus Pseudomonas are recognized as major food spoilers and the capability to actually determine spoilage can be species- as well as strain-dependent. In order to improve the taxonomic resolution of 16S rRNA gene amplicons, in this study we used oligotyping to investigate the diversity of Pseudomonas populations in meat and dairy processing environments. Sequences of the V1-V3 regions from previous studies were used, including environmental swabs and food samples from both meat and dairy processing plants. We showed that the most frequently found oligotypes belonged to Pseudomonas fragi and P. fluorescens, that the most abundant oligotypes co-occurred, and were shared between the meat and dairy datasets. All the oligotypes occurring in foods were also identified in the environmental samples of the corresponding plants, highlighting the important role of the environment as a source of strains for food contamination. Oligotypes of the same species showed different levels depending on food processing and type of sample, suggesting that different strains of the same species can have different adaptation efficiency, leading to resilient bacterial associations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 112 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 42 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 55 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2017.
All research outputs
#3,765,476
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#3,586
of 24,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,245
of 310,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#119
of 459 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,998 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 459 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.