↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Evolutionary Processes of Species Jump in Waterfowl Parvovirus

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of Evolutionary Processes of Species Jump in Waterfowl Parvovirus
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00421
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wentao Fan, Zhaoyu Sun, Tongtong Shen, Danning Xu, Kehe Huang, Jiyong Zhou, Suquan Song, Liping Yan

Abstract

Waterfowl parvoviruses are classified into goose parvovirus (GPV) and Muscovy duck parvovirus (MDPV) according to their antigenic features and host preferences. A novel duck parvovirus (NDPV), identified as a new variant of GPV, is currently infecting ducks, thus causing considerable economic loss. This study analyzed the molecular evolution and population dynamics of the emerging parvovirus capsid gene to investigate the evolutionary processes concerning the host shift of NDPV. Two important amino acids changes (Asn-489 and Asn-650) were identified in NDPV, which may be responsible for host shift of NDPV. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the currently circulating NDPV originated from the GPV lineage. The Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo tree indicated that the NDPV diverged from GPV approximately 20 years ago. Evolutionary rate analyses demonstrated that GPV evolved with 7.674 × 10(-4) substitutions/site/year, and the data for MDPV was 5.237 × 10(-4) substitutions/site/year, whereas the substitution rate in NDPV branch was 2.25 × 10(-3) substitutions/site/year. Meanwhile, viral population dynamics analysis revealed that the GPV major clade, including NDPV, grew exponentially at a rate of 1.717 year(-1). Selection pressure analysis showed that most sites are subject to strong purifying selection and no positively selected sites were found in NDPV. The unique immune-epitopes in waterfowl parvovirus were also estimated, which may be helpful for the prediction of antibody binding sites against NDPV in ducks.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 21%
Student > Master 2 14%
Researcher 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Unknown 7 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2017.
All research outputs
#23,715,077
of 26,397,269 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#24,995
of 30,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,554
of 326,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#454
of 496 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,397,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 496 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.