↓ Skip to main content

Zinc-Dependent Transcriptional Regulation in Paracoccus denitrificans

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Zinc-Dependent Transcriptional Regulation in Paracoccus denitrificans
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00569
Pubmed ID
Authors

Durga P. Neupane, Belkis Jacquez, Anitha Sundararajan, Thiruvarangan Ramaraj, Faye D. Schilkey, Erik T. Yukl

Abstract

Zinc homeostasis is critical for bacterial survival and is mediated largely at the transcriptional level by the regulation of zinc uptake and efflux genes. Here we use RNA-seq to assess transcriptional changes as a result of zinc limitation in the denitrifying bacterium Paracoccus denitrificans. The results identify the differential expression of 147 genes, most of which were upregulated in zinc-depleted medium. Included in this set of genes are a large number of transition metal transporters, several transcription factors, and hypothetical proteins. Intriguingly, genes encoding nitric oxide reductase (norCB) and nitrite reductase (nirS) were also upregulated. A Zur consensus binding motif was identified in the promoters of the most highly upregulated genes. The zinc uptake regulator (Zur) from this organism was also characterized and shown to bind to the Zur motif in a zinc-dependent manner. This work expands our current understanding of the transcriptional response of gram-negative bacteria to zinc limitation and identifies genes involved in denitrification as part of the Zur regulon.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 18%
Engineering 3 9%
Unspecified 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 11 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2017.
All research outputs
#18,542,806
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#19,466
of 25,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,941
of 310,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#398
of 497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.