The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Benthic Diatom Based Indices for Water Quality Assessment in Two Subtropical Streams
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00601 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiang Tan, Quanfa Zhang, Michele A. Burford, Fran Sheldon, Stuart E. Bunn |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 24 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,205,625
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,598
of 29,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,622
of 328,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#48
of 499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.