↓ Skip to main content

New Insights in to the Intrinsic and Acquired Drug Resistance Mechanisms in Mycobacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
329 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New Insights in to the Intrinsic and Acquired Drug Resistance Mechanisms in Mycobacteria
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00681
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad J. Nasiri, Mehri Haeili, Mona Ghazi, Hossein Goudarzi, Ali Pormohammad, Abbas A. Imani Fooladi, Mohammad M. Feizabadi

Abstract

Infectious diseases caused by clinically important Mycobacteria continue to be an important public health problem worldwide primarily due to emergence of drug resistance crisis. In recent years, the control of tuberculosis (TB), the disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), is hampered by the emergence of multidrug resistance (MDR), defined as resistance to at least isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF), two key drugs in the treatment of the disease. Despite the availability of curative anti-TB therapy, inappropriate and inadequate treatment has allowed MTB to acquire resistance to the most important anti-TB drugs. Likewise, for most mycobacteria other than MTB, the outcome of drug treatment is poor and is likely related to the high levels of antibiotic resistance. Thus, a better knowledge of the underlying mechanisms of drug resistance in mycobacteria could aid not only to select the best therapeutic options but also to develop novel drugs that can overwhelm the existing resistance mechanisms. In this article, we review the distinctive mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in mycobacteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 327 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 14%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Researcher 32 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 43 13%
Unknown 101 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 67 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 42 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 7%
Other 30 9%
Unknown 108 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,281,255
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,716
of 25,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,087
of 309,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#241
of 516 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 516 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.