↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Genomic Analysis of the Class Epsilonproteobacteria and Proposed Reclassification to Epsilonbacteraeota (phyl. nov.)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 X users
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative Genomic Analysis of the Class Epsilonproteobacteria and Proposed Reclassification to Epsilonbacteraeota (phyl. nov.)
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00682
Pubmed ID
Authors

David W. Waite, Inka Vanwonterghem, Christian Rinke, Donovan H. Parks, Ying Zhang, Ken Takai, Stefan M. Sievert, Jörg Simon, Barbara J. Campbell, Thomas E. Hanson, Tanja Woyke, Martin G. Klotz, Philip Hugenholtz

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 349 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 20%
Researcher 54 15%
Student > Master 50 14%
Student > Bachelor 36 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 50 14%
Unknown 74 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 64 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 37 10%
Environmental Science 36 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 3%
Other 31 9%
Unknown 90 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,597,420
of 26,397,269 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#968
of 30,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,208
of 328,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#26
of 511 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,397,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 511 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.