↓ Skip to main content

Deep Sea Actinomycetes and Their Secondary Metabolites

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deep Sea Actinomycetes and Their Secondary Metabolites
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00760
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manita Kamjam, Periyasamy Sivalingam, Zinxin Deng, Kui Hong

Abstract

Deep sea is a unique and extreme environment. It is a hot spot for hunting marine actinomycetes resources and secondary metabolites. The novel deep sea actinomycete species reported from 2006 to 2016 including 21 species under 13 genera with the maximum number from Microbacterium, followed by Dermacoccus, Streptomyces and Verrucosispora, and one novel species for the other 9 genera. Eight genera of actinomycetes were reported to produce secondary metabolites, among which Streptomyces is the richest producer. Most of the compounds produced by the deep sea actinomycetes presented antimicrobial and anti-cancer cell activities. Gene clusters related to biosynthesis of desotamide, heronamide, and lobophorin have been identified from the deep sea derived Streptomyces.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 190 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 19%
Student > Bachelor 30 16%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Researcher 9 5%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 60 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 8%
Chemistry 10 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 69 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2017.
All research outputs
#16,718,581
of 25,388,177 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#16,463
of 29,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,330
of 324,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#329
of 519 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 519 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.