Sofia Milker, Leticia C. P. Goncalves, Michael J. Fink, Florian Rudroff
Abstract
This paper describes the measurement and analysis of in vivo activity and stability of cyclohexanone monooxygenase from Acinetobacter sp. NCIMB 9871 (CHMO), a model Baeyer-Villiger monooxygenase, in the recombinant host Escherichia coli. This enzyme was often described as poorly stable in vitro, and has recently been found to deactivate rapidly in the absence of its essential cofactors and antioxidants. Its stability in vivo was scarcely studied, so far. Under conditions common for the overexpression of CHMO we investigated the ability of the host to support these properties using metabolomics. Our results showed that E. coli failed to provide the intracellular levels of cofactors required to functionally stabilize the enzyme, although the biocatalyst was produced in high concentration, and was invariably detected after protein synthesis had stopped. We thus infer that biotechnological applications of CHMO with this host relied on a residual activity of approximately 5-10%. Other microorganisms might offer a more efficient solution for recombinant production of CHMO and related enzymes.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,004,007
of 24,990,015 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#17,609
of 28,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,788
of 332,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#371
of 539 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,990,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 539 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
