↓ Skip to main content

Rokubacteria: Genomic Giants among the Uncultured Bacterial Phyla

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
33 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rokubacteria: Genomic Giants among the Uncultured Bacterial Phyla
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02264
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric D. Becraft, Tanja Woyke, Jessica Jarett, Natalia Ivanova, Filipa Godoy-Vitorino, Nicole Poulton, Julia M. Brown, Joseph Brown, M. C. Y. Lau, Tullis Onstott, Jonathan A. Eisen, Duane Moser, Ramunas Stepanauskas

Abstract

Recent advances in single-cell genomic and metagenomic techniques have facilitated the discovery of numerous previously unknown, deep branches of the tree of life that lack cultured representatives. Many of these candidate phyla are composed of microorganisms with minimalistic, streamlined genomes lacking some core metabolic pathways, which may contribute to their resistance to growth in pure culture. Here we analyzed single-cell genomes and metagenome bins to show that the "Candidate phylum Rokubacteria," formerly known as SPAM, represents an interesting exception, by having large genomes (6-8 Mbps), high GC content (66-71%), and the potential for a versatile, mixotrophic metabolism. We also observed an unusually high genomic heterogeneity among individual Rokubacteria cells in the studied samples. These features may have contributed to the limited recovery of sequences of this candidate phylum in prior cultivation and metagenomic studies. Our analyses suggest that Rokubacteria are distributed globally in diverse terrestrial ecosystems, including soils, the rhizosphere, volcanic mud, oil wells, aquifers, and the deep subsurface, with no reports from marine environments to date.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 175 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 24%
Researcher 40 23%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 28 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 19%
Environmental Science 28 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 10%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 34 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,567,550
of 24,383,935 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#977
of 27,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,790
of 447,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#25
of 519 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,383,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 519 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.