↓ Skip to main content

Substrate-Limited and -Unlimited Coastal Microbial Communities Show Different Metabolic Responses with Regard to Temperature

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Substrate-Limited and -Unlimited Coastal Microbial Communities Show Different Metabolic Responses with Regard to Temperature
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02270
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helmut Maske, Ramón Cajal-Medrano, Josué Villegas-Mendoza

Abstract

Bacteria are the principal consumers of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the ocean and predation of bacteria makes organic carbon available to higher trophic levels. The efficiency with which bacteria convert the consumed carbon (C) into biomass (i.e., carbon growth efficiency, Y) determines their ecological as well as biogeochemical role in marine ecosystems. Yet, it is still unclear how changes in temperature will affect Y and, hence, the transfer of consumed C to higher trophic levels. Here, we experimentally investigated the effect of temperature on metabolic functions of coastal microbial communities inoculated in both nutrient-limited chemostats and nutrient-unlimited turbidostats. We inoculated chemostats and turbidostats with coastal microbial communities into seawater culture medium augmented with 20 and 100 μmol L-1 of glucose respectively and measured CO2 production, carbon biomass and cell abundance. Chemostats were cultured between 14 and 26°C and specific growth rates (μ) between 0.05 and 6.0 day-1, turbidostats were cultured between 10 and 26°C with specific growth rates ranging from 28 to 62 day-1. In chemostats under substrate limitation, which is common in the ocean, the specific respiration rate (r, day-1) showed no trend with temperature and was roughly proportional to μ, implying that carbon growth efficiency (Y) displayed no tendency with temperature. The response was very different in turbidostats under temperature-limited, nutrient-repleted growth, here μ increased with temperature but r decreased resulting in an increase of Y with temperature (Q10: 2.6). Comparison of our results with data from the literature on the respiration rate and cell weight of monospecific bacteria indicates that in general the literature data behaved similar to chemostat data, showing no trend in specific respiration with temperature. We conclude that respiration rates of nutrient-limited bacteria measured at a certain temperature cannot be adjusted to different temperatures with a temperature response function similar to Q10 or Arrhenius. However, the cellular respiration rate and carbon demand rate (both: mol C cell-1 day-1) show statistically significant relations with cellular carbon content (mol C cell-1) in chemostats, turbidostats, and the literature data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 28%
Environmental Science 5 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,972,614
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#12,571
of 27,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,979
of 445,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#319
of 532 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 532 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.