↓ Skip to main content

Screening and Identification of the Host Proteins Interacting with Toxoplasma gondii Rhoptry Protein ROP16

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening and Identification of the Host Proteins Interacting with Toxoplasma gondii Rhoptry Protein ROP16
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02408
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ming Pan, Yanqin Zhou, Yifan Wang, Longjiao Li, Yongle Song, Lun Hou, Junlong Zhao

Abstract

Toxoplasma gondii, as a zoonotic protozoan parasite, develops sophisticated strategies to manipulate hosts for efficient intracellular survival. After successful invasion, T. gondii injects many effector proteins into host cells for various purposes. TgROP16 (T. gondii rhoptry protein 16), which is secreted from rhoptries into host cells, can activate the host STAT (signal transducer and activator of transcription) signaling pathway through phosphorylation of STAT3 and STAT6. However, whether there are other host proteins modulated by TgROP16 is currently unknown. In this study, yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screen was used to look for additional host proteins interacting with TgROP16. Yeast cells expressing a mouse cDNA library cloned into the prey vector were used to mate with yeasts expressing ROP16 without signal peptide. Two mouse proteins, Dnaja1 (DnaJ heat shock protein family member A1) and Gabra4 (gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor, subunit alpha 4) were identified to interact with ROP16 from this screen. Further analysis suggested that the Predomain of ROP16 played key roles in mediating interactions with these host proteins, whereas the contribution from the Kinase domain was minor. The interactions between Dnaja1 and different parts of ROP16 were also estimated in vivo by co-immunoprecipitation. The results showed that the Predomain of ROP16 was the major region to interact with Dnaja1, which is consistent with the Y2H results. Based on the gene ontology analysis, Dnaja1 is predicted to participate in stress response while Gabra4 is involved in the system development process. The discovery of new host proteins that interact with ROP16 of T. gondii will help us to further investigate the functions of this effector proteins during T. gondii infection.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 32%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 9%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,706,682
of 23,341,064 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#15,672
of 25,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,448
of 441,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#360
of 523 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,341,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 523 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.