↓ Skip to main content

Green Tea Catechin-Inactivated Viral Vaccine Platform

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Green Tea Catechin-Inactivated Viral Vaccine Platform
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02469
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yun H. Lee, Yo H. Jang, Young H. Byun, Yucheol Cheong, Paul Kim, Young J. Lee, Yoon J. Lee, Je M. Sung, Ahyun Son, Hye M. Lee, Jinhee Lee, Seung W. Yang, Jae-Min Song, Baik L. Seong

Abstract

Traditionally, chemical agents such as formalin (FA) and β-propiolactone (BPL) have long been used for the preparation of inactivated vaccines or toxoids. It has been shown that FA extensively modifies vaccine antigens and thus affects immunogenicity profiles, sometimes compromising the protective efficacy of the vaccines or even exacerbating the disease upon infection. In this study, we show that natural catechins from green tea extracts (GT) can be used as an inactivating agent to prepare inactivated viral vaccines. GT treatment resulted in complete and irreversible inactivation of influenza virus as well as dengue virus. In contrast to FA that reacted extensively with multiple amino acids including lysine, a major anchor residue for epitope binding to MHC molecules, GT catechin epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) crosslinked primarily with cysteine residues and thus preserved the major epitopes of the influenza hemagglutinin. In a mouse model, vaccination with GT-inactivated influenza virus (GTi virus) elicited higher levels of viral neutralizing antibodies than FA-inactivated virus (FAi virus). The vaccination completely protected the mice from a lethal challenge and restricted the challenge viral replication in the lungs. Of note, the quality of antibody responses of GTi virus was superior to that with FAi virus, in terms of the magnitude of antibody titer, cross-reactivity to hetero-subtypes of influenza viruses, and the avidity to viral antigens. As the first report of using non-toxic natural compounds for the preparation of inactivated viral vaccines, the present results could be translated into a clinically relevant vaccine platform with improved efficacy, safety, productivity, and public acceptance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 10 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,297,348
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,739
of 25,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,685
of 439,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#240
of 512 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 512 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.