↓ Skip to main content

Mutations in Two Paraburkholderia phymatum Type VI Secretion Systems Cause Reduced Fitness in Interbacterial Competition

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutations in Two Paraburkholderia phymatum Type VI Secretion Systems Cause Reduced Fitness in Interbacterial Competition
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02473
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samanta Bolzan de Campos, Martina Lardi, Alessia Gandolfi, Leo Eberl, Gabriella Pessi

Abstract

Paraburkholderia phymatum is a highly effective microsymbiont of Mimosa spp. and has also been shown to nodulate papilionoid legumes. P. phymatum was found to be highly competitive both in a natural environment as well as under controlled test conditions and is more competitive for nodulation over other α- and β-rhizobial strains in a variety of different plant hosts. In order to elucidate the factors that make this bacterium highly competitive for legume infection, we here characterized the type VI secretion system (T6SS) clusters of P. phymatum. T6SSs have been shown to function as a contact-dependent injection system for both bacterial and eukaryotic cells. We identified two T6SS clusters in the genome, created respective mutant strains and showed that they are defective in biofilm formation and in interbacterial competition in vitro. While the T6SS mutants were as efficient as the wild-type in nodulating the non-cognate host Vigna unguiculata, the mutants were less competitive in in planta competition assays, suggesting that the T6SS is one of the factors responsible for the success of P. phymatum in infecting legumes by directly inhibiting competitors.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 27%