The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Classical Swine Fever Virus Infection and Its NS4A Protein Expression Induce IL-8 Production through MAVS Signaling Pathway in Swine Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02687 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wang Dong, Huifang Lv, Kangkang Guo, Tao Wang, Yueling Ouyang, Mingxing Jin, Yanming Zhang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,833,191
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4,961
of 25,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,684
of 444,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#170
of 546 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 546 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.