↓ Skip to main content

Embelin Restores Carbapenem Efficacy against NDM-1-Positive Pathogens

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Embelin Restores Carbapenem Efficacy against NDM-1-Positive Pathogens
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00071
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nian-Zhi Ning, Xiong Liu, Fanghong Chen, Peng Zhou, Lihong Hu, Jian Huang, Zhan Li, Jie Huang, Tao Li, Hui Wang

Abstract

The emergence and spread of carbapenemase in Gram-negative pathogens poses an enormous threat to global public health. New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-1 (NDM-1) inactivates nearly every class of β-lactam antibiotics, including carbapenem; however, there is no clinically useful NDM-1 inhibitor. Embelin, an important ingredient in traditional herbal medicine, has anti-tumor effects. The current study is the first to discover and examine the inhibitory activity of embelin against β-lactamase NDM-1. The IC50 of embelin was 2.1 ± 0.2 μM when tested against NDM-1 carbapenemase. Most regions of the embelin molecule were buried within NDM-1's active site, and the hydroxyl group of embelin interacted directly with the metal ion Zn2+, as shown by molecular dynamic simulation. Systematic analysis of the antibacterial activities of embelin and antibiotics demonstrated that embelin restored meropenem activity against a panel of NDM-positive pathogens, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Acinetobacter baumannii. Based on these results, embelin could be a promising carbapenem adjuvant candidate against NDM-1-producing bacterial strains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 14 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,033,208
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,338
of 25,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,184
of 441,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#235
of 545 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 545 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.