The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification and Characterization of T5-Like Bacteriophages Representing Two Novel Subgroups from Food Products
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00202 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Domonkos Sváb, Linda Falgenhauer, Manfred Rohde, Judit Szabó, Trinad Chakraborty, István Tóth |
| Abstract |
During recent years, interest in the use of bacteriophages as biocontrol agents against foodborne pathogens has increased, particularly for members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, with pathogenicEscherichia coli, Shigella, and Salmonellastrains among them. Here, we report the isolation and characterisation of 12 novel T5-like bacteriophages from confiscated food samples. All bacterophages effectively lysedE. coliK-12 strains and were able to infect pathogenicE. colistrains representing enterohaemorrhagic (EHEC), enteropathogenic (EPEC), enterotoxigenic (ETEC), and enteroinvasive (EIEC) pathotypes,Shigella dysenteriae, S. sonneistrains, as well as multidrug-resistant (MDR)E. coliand multiple strains representing differentSalmonella entericaserovars. All the bacteriophages exhibitedSiphoviridaemorphology. Whole genome sequencing of the novel T5-like bacteriophages showed that they represent two distinct groups, with the genome-based grouping correlating to the different host spectra. As these bacteriophages are of food origin, their stability and lack of any virulence genes, as well as their broad and mutually complementary host spectrum makes these new T5-like bacteriophages valuable candidates for use as biocontrol agents against foodborne pathogenic enterobacteria. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 16 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 14% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2019.
All research outputs
#13,582,166
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#10,650
of 25,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,723
of 446,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#300
of 558 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 558 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.