The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Vibrio tapetis Displays an Original Type IV Secretion System in Strains Pathogenic for Bivalve Molluscs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00227 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Graciela M. Dias, Adeline Bidault, Patrick Le Chevalier, Gwenaëlle Choquet, Clio Der Sarkissian, Ludovic Orlando, Claudine Medigue, Valerie Barbe, Sophie Mangenot, Cristiane C. Thompson, Fabiano L. Thompson, Annick Jacq, Vianney Pichereau, Christine Paillard |
| Abstract |
The Brown Ring Disease (BRD) caused high mortality rates since 1986 in the Manila clamVenerupis philippinarumintroduced and cultured in Western Europe from the 1970s. The causative agent of BRD is a Gram-Negative bacterium,Vibrio tapetis, which is also pathogenic to fish. Here we report the first assembly of the complete genome ofV. tapetisCECT4600T, together with the genome sequences of 16 additional strains isolated across a broad host and geographic range. Our extensive genome dataset allowed us to describe the pathogen pan- and core genomes and to identify putative virulence factors. TheV. tapetiscore genome consists of 3,352 genes, including multiple potential virulence factors represented by haemolysins, transcriptional regulators, Type I restriction modification system, GGDEF domain proteins, several conjugative plasmids, and a Type IV secretion system. Future research on the coevolutionary arms race betweenV. tapetisvirulence factors and host resistance mechanisms will improve our understanding of how pathogenicity develops in this emerging pathogen. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 50% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Professor | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,309,367
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#3,990
of 29,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,739
of 344,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#126
of 580 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 580 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.