↓ Skip to main content

HTLV-1: Regulating the Balance Between Proviral Latency and Reactivation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HTLV-1: Regulating the Balance Between Proviral Latency and Reactivation
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00449
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anurag Kulkarni, Charles R M Bangham

Abstract

HTLV-1 plus-strand transcription begins with the production of doubly-splicedtax/rextranscripts, the levels of which are usually undetectable in freshly isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from HTLV-1-infected individuals. However, the presence of a sustained chronically active cytotoxic T-cell response to HTLV-1 antigens in virtually all HTLV-1-infected individuals, regardless of their proviral load, argues against complete latency of the virusin vivo. There is an immediate burst of plus-strand transcription when blood from infected individuals is culturedex vivo. How is the HTLV-1 plus strand silenced in PBMCs? Is it silenced in other anatomical compartments within the host? What reactivates the latent provirus in fresh PBMCs? While plus-strand transcription of the provirus appears to be intermittent, the minus-strandhbztranscripts are present in a majority of cells, albeit at low levels. What regulates the difference between the 5'- and 3'-LTR promoter activities and thereby thetax-hbzinterplay? Finally, T lymphocytes are a migratory population of cells that encounter variable environments in different compartments of the body. Could these micro-environment changes influence the reactivation kinetics of the provirus? In this review we discuss the questions raised above, focusing on the early events leading to HTLV-1 reactivation from latency, and suggest future research directions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 28%
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 11%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,103,984
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#11,574
of 25,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,080
of 332,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#345
of 604 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 604 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.