↓ Skip to main content

The LuxR Regulators PcoR and RfiA Co-regulate Antimicrobial Peptide and Alginate Production in Pseudomonas corrugata

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The LuxR Regulators PcoR and RfiA Co-regulate Antimicrobial Peptide and Alginate Production in Pseudomonas corrugata
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00521
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grazia Licciardello, Andrea Caruso, Patrizia Bella, Rodolpho Gheleri, Cinzia P. Strano, Alice Anzalone, Emmanouil A. Trantas, Panagiotis F. Sarris, Nalvo F. Almeida, Vittoria Catara

Abstract

Cyclic lipopeptides (CLPs) are considered as some of the most important secondary metabolites in different plant-associated bacteria, thanks to their antimicrobial, cytotoxic, and surfactant properties. In this study, our aim was to investigate the role of the Quorum Sensing (QS) system, PcoI/PcoR, and the LuxR-type transcriptional regulator RfiA in CLP production in the phytopatogenic bacterium, Pseudomonas corrugata based on our previous work where we reported that the pcoR and rfiA mutants were devoid of the CLPs cormycin and corpeptin production. Due to the close genetic link between the QS system and the RfiA (rfiA is co-transcribed with pcoI), it was difficult to ascertain the specific regulatory role in the expression of target genes. A transcriptional approach was undertaken to identify the specific role of the PcoR and RfiA transcriptional regulators for the expression of genes involved in CLP production. The RNA-seq-based transcriptional analysis of the wild-type (WT) strain CFBP 5454 in comparison with GL2 (pcoR mutant) and GLRFIA (rfiA mutant) was performed in cultural conditions favoring CLP production. Differential gene expression revealed that 152 and 130 genes have significantly different levels of expression in the pcoR and rfiA mutants, respectively. Of these, the genes linked to the biosynthesis of CLPs and alginate were positively controlled by both PcoR and RfiA. Blast homology analysis showed that 19 genes in a large CLP biosynthetic cluster involved in the production of three antimicrobial peptides, which span approximately 3.5% of the genome, are strongly over-expressed in the WT strain. Thus, PcoR and RfiA function mainly as activators in the production of bioactive CLPs, in agreement with phenotype analysis of mutants. RNA-seq also revealed that almost all the genes in the structural/biosynthetic cluster of alginate exopolysaccharide (EPS) are under the control of the PcoR-RfiA regulon, as supported by the 10-fold reduction in total EPS yield isolated in both mutants in comparison to the parent strain. A total of 68 and 38 gene expressions was independently regulated by PcoR or RfiA proteins, respectively, but at low level. qPCR experiments suggest that growth medium and plant environment influence the expression of CLP and alginate genes.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 14 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#4,740,837
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4,865
of 25,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,034
of 331,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#185
of 608 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 608 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.