The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Perspectives of Phage–Eukaryotic Cell Interactions to Control Epstein–Barr Virus Infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00630 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrzej Górski, Ryszard Międzybrodzki, Ewa Jończyk-Matysiak, Beata Weber-Dąbrowska, Natalia Bagińska, Jan Borysowski |
| Abstract |
Recently, leading medical journals emphasized the importance of further studies on the potential application of bacterial viruses (phages) for the treatment of antibiotics-resistant infections outlining the present status of the therapy and perspectives for the future. Furthermore, a leading scientific journal pointed to the recent progress in research on phage interactions with eukaryotic cells (especially cells of the immune system) and potential implications of their results for our broader understanding of the role of phages - not only as "bacteria eaters" - but also as an important part of our body defense protecting against external and internal pathogenic invaders (as suggested previously). This illustrates how our understanding of the actual role and potential of phages is expanding and how worldwide interest in their use in medicine is growing. In this article we envision how this advancement of our knowledge about phages could be translated into the progress in combating herpesvirus infections especially those caused by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 57% |
| Scientists | 7 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2024.
All research outputs
#3,412,830
of 26,314,361 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,899
of 30,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,197
of 347,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#96
of 594 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 594 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.