↓ Skip to main content

New Insights Into the Mechanisms and Biological Roles of D-Amino Acids in Complex Eco-Systems

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
39 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New Insights Into the Mechanisms and Biological Roles of D-Amino Acids in Complex Eco-Systems
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00683
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alena Aliashkevich, Laura Alvarez, Felipe Cava

Abstract

In the environment bacteria share their habitat with a great diversity of organisms, from microbes to humans, animals and plants. In these complex communities, the production of extracellular effectors is a common strategy to control the biodiversity by interfering with the growth and/or viability of nearby microbes. One of such effectors relies on the production and release of extracellular D-amino acids which regulate diverse cellular processes such as cell wall biogenesis, biofilm integrity, and spore germination. Non-canonical D-amino acids are mainly produced by broad spectrum racemases (Bsr). Bsr's promiscuity allows it to generate high concentrations of D-amino acids in environments with variable compositions of L-amino acids. However, it was not clear until recent whether these molecules exhibit divergent functions. Here we review the distinctive biological roles of D-amino acids, their mechanisms of action and their modulatory properties of the biodiversity of complex eco-systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 210 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 72 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 15%
Chemistry 17 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 4%
Environmental Science 8 4%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 78 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 314. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2022.
All research outputs
#101,944
of 24,450,293 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#56
of 27,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,607
of 333,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4
of 589 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,450,293 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 589 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.