↓ Skip to main content

Extremophilic Microfactories: Applications in Metal and Radionuclide Bioremediation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extremophilic Microfactories: Applications in Metal and Radionuclide Bioremediation
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catarina R. Marques

Abstract

Metals and radionuclides (M&Rs) are a worldwide concern claiming for resilient, efficient, and sustainable clean-up measures aligned with environmental protection goals and global change constraints. The unique defense mechanisms of extremophilic bacteria and archaea have been proving usefulness towards M&Rs bioremediation. Hence, extremophiles can be viewed as microfactories capable of providing specific and controlled services (i.e., genetic/metabolic mechanisms) and/or products (e.g., biomolecules) for that purpose. However, the natural physiological plasticity of such extremophilic microfactories can be further explored to nourish different hallmarks of M&R bioremediation, which are scantly approached in the literature and were never integrated. Therefore, this review not only briefly describes major valuable extremophilic pathways for M&R bioremediation, as it highlights the advances, challenges and gaps from the interplay of 'omics' and biological engineering to improve extremophilic microfactories performance for M&R clean-up. Microfactories' potentialities are also envisaged to close the M&R bioremediation processes and shift the classical idea of never 'getting rid' of M&Rs into making them 'the belle of the ball' through bio-recycling and bio-recovering techniques.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 20%
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Professor 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 28 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Chemical Engineering 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 34 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,228,294
of 25,058,660 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,335
of 28,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,321
of 336,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#213
of 661 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,058,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 661 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.