↓ Skip to main content

Expression of Hemolysin Is Regulated Under the Collective Actions of HapR, Fur, and HlyU in Vibrio cholerae El Tor Serogroup O1

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expression of Hemolysin Is Regulated Under the Collective Actions of HapR, Fur, and HlyU in Vibrio cholerae El Tor Serogroup O1
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01310
Pubmed ID
Authors

He Gao, Jialiang Xu, Xin Lu, Jie Li, Jing Lou, Hongqun Zhao, Baowei Diao, Qiannan Shi, Yiquan Zhang, Biao Kan

Abstract

The biotype El Tor of serogroup O1 and most of the non-O1/non-O139 strains of Vibrio cholerae can produce an extracellular pore-forming toxin known as cholera hemolysin (HlyA). Expression of HlyA has been previously reported to be regulated by the quorum sensing (QS) and the regulatory proteins HlyU and Fur, but lacks the direct evidence for their binding to the promoter of hlyA. In the present work, we showed that the QS regulator HapR, along with Fur and HlyU, regulates the transcription of hlyA in V. cholerae El Tor biotype. At the late mid-logarithmic growth phase, HapR binds to the three promoters of fur, hlyU, and hlyA to repress their transcription. At the early mid-logarithmic growth phase, Fur binds to the promoters of hlyU and hlyA to repress their transcription; meanwhile, HlyU binds to the promoter of hlyA to activate its transcription, but it manifests direct inhibition of its own gene. The highest transcriptional level of hlyA occurs at an OD600 value of around 0.6-0.7, which may be due to the subtle regulation of HapR, Fur, and HlyU. The complex regulation of HapR, Fur, and HlyU on hlyA would be beneficial to the invasion and pathogenesis of V. cholerae during the different infection stages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 2 6%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 8 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 17%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,641,800
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#19,659
of 25,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,997
of 328,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#529
of 716 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 716 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.