↓ Skip to main content

Lanthanide-Dependent Methanol Dehydrogenases of XoxF4 and XoxF5 Clades Are Differentially Distributed Among Methylotrophic Bacteria and They Reveal Different Biochemical Properties

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lanthanide-Dependent Methanol Dehydrogenases of XoxF4 and XoxF5 Clades Are Differentially Distributed Among Methylotrophic Bacteria and They Reveal Different Biochemical Properties
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01366
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Huang, Zheng Yu, Ludmila Chistoserdova

Abstract

Lanthanide-dependent alcohol dehydrogenases have recently emerged as environmentally important enzymes, most prominently represented in methylotrophic bacteria. The diversity of these enzymes, their environmental distribution, and their biochemistry, as well as their evolutionary relationships with their calcium-dependent counterparts remain virtually untapped. Here, we make important advances toward understanding lanthanide-dependent methylotrophy by assessing the distribution of XoxF4 and XoxF5 clades of lanthanide methanol dehydrogenases among, respectively, Methylophilaceae and non-Methylophilaceae methylotrophs, and we carry out comparative biochemical characterization of XoxF4 and XoxF5 enzymes, demonstrating differences in their properties, including catalytic efficiencies. We conclude that one subtype of the XoxF4 enzyme, XoxF4-1 is the dominant type in nature while other XoxF4 subtypes appear to be auxiliary, representatives of this clade only found in the Methylophilaceae (Betaproteobacteria). In contrast, we demonstrate that XoxF5 enzymes are widespread among Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaproteobacteria. We purified and biochemically characterized two XoxF4 enzymes (XoxF4-1 and XoxF4-2), both from Methylotenera mobilis, and one XoxF5 enzyme, from Methylomonas sp., after expressing their His-tagged versions in respective natural hosts. All three enzymes showed broad specificities toward alcohols and aldehydes and strict dependence on lighter lanthanides. However, they revealed differences in their properties in terms of optimal pH for in vitro activity, ammonia dependence, the range of lanthanides that could serve as cofactors, and in kinetic properties. Overall, our data advance the understanding of the biochemistry and environmental distribution of these recently discovered enzymes that appear to be key enzymes in lanthanide-dependent methylotrophy.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 23%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 23 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 17%
Environmental Science 7 10%
Chemistry 6 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 24 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,652,345
of 23,507,888 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#6,813
of 25,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,613
of 330,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#245
of 714 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,507,888 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 714 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.