↓ Skip to main content

Cholecystectomy Damages Aging-Associated Intestinal Microbiota Construction

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cholecystectomy Damages Aging-Associated Intestinal Microbiota Construction
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01402
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenxue Wang, Junfeng Wang, Julan Li, Pingping Yan, Yun Jin, Ruyi Zhang, Wei Yue, Qiang Guo, Jiawei Geng

Abstract

The intestinal microbiome is essential in humans to maintain physiological balance and nutrition metabolism. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to gallstone disease and cholecystitis can cause intestinal microbial dysbiosis, and following bile acid metabolism dysfunction, positions the patient at high risk of colorectal cancer. However, little is known regarding intestinal microbiota characteristics in post-cholecystectomy patients. Here, we compared the microbial composition of cholecystectomy patients with that of a healthy population. We determined that cholecystectomy eliminated aging-associated fecal commensal microbiota and further identified several bile acid metabolism-related bacteria as contributors of colorectal cancer incidence via elevation of secondary bile acids. We identified aging-associated fecal microbiota in a healthy population, which was lost in cholecystectomy patients. Absent intestinal bacteria, such as Bacteroides, were negatively related to secondary bile acids and may be a leading cause of colorectal cancer incidence in cholecystectomy patients. Our study provides novel insight into the connection between cholecystectomy-altered gut microbiota and colorectal carcinoma, which is of value for colorectal cancer diagnosis and management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Other 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,862,191
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#3,678
of 26,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,996
of 329,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#136
of 718 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 718 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.