↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Fur in the Transcriptional and Iron Homeostatic Response of Enterococcus faecalis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Fur in the Transcriptional and Iron Homeostatic Response of Enterococcus faecalis
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01580
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mauricio Latorre, Daniela Quenti, Dante Travisany, Kavindra V. Singh, Barbara E. Murray, Alejandro Maass, Verónica Cambiazo

Abstract

The ferric uptake regulator (Fur) plays a major role in controlling the expression of iron homeostasis genes in bacterial organisms. In this work, we fully characterized the capacity of Fur to reconfigure the global transcriptional network and influence iron homeostasis in Enterococcus faecalis. The characterization of the Fur regulon from E. faecalis indicated that this protein (Fur) regulated the expression of genes involved in iron uptake systems, conferring to the system a high level of efficiency and specificity to respond under different iron exposure conditions. An RNAseq assay coupled with a systems biology approach allowed us to identify the first global transcriptional network activated by different iron treatments (excess and limited), with and without the presence of Fur. The results showed that changes in iron availability activated a complex network of transcriptional factors in E. faecalis, among them global regulators such as LysR, ArgR, GalRS, and local regulators, LexA and CopY, which were also stimulated by copper and zinc treatments. The deletion of Fur impacted the expression of genes encoding for ABC transporters, energy production and [Fe-S] proteins, which optimized detoxification and iron uptake under iron excess and limitation, respectively. Finally, considering the close relationship between iron homeostasis and pathogenesis, our data showed that the absence of Fur increased the internal concentration of iron in the bacterium and also affected its ability to produce biofilm. These results open new alternatives in the field of infection mechanisms of E. faecalis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 27%
Student > Master 6 16%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,643,992
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#19,668
of 25,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,543
of 296,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#553
of 736 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 736 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.