↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Lipoproteins in Mycoplasma-Mediated Immunomodulation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Lipoproteins in Mycoplasma-Mediated Immunomodulation
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01682
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexei Christodoulides, Neha Gupta, Vahe Yacoubian, Neil Maithel, Jordan Parker, Theodoros Kelesidis

Abstract

Mycoplasma infections, such as walking pneumonia or pelvic inflammatory diseases, are a major threat to public health. Despite their relatively small physical and genomic size, mycoplasmas are known to elicit strong host immune responses, generally inflammatory, while also being able to evade the immune system. The mycoplasma membrane is composed of approximately two-thirds protein and one-third lipid and contains several lipoproteins that are known to regulate host immune responses. Herein, the immunomodulatory effects of mycoplasma lipoproteins are reviewed. A better understanding of the immunomodulatory effects, both activating and evasive, of Mycoplasma surface lipoproteins will contribute to understanding mechanisms potentially relevant to mycoplasma disease vaccine development and treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 16 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#15,175,585
of 24,093,053 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#13,653
of 27,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,111
of 333,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#414
of 739 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,093,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 739 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.