↓ Skip to main content

Negative Binomial Mixed Models for Analyzing Longitudinal Microbiome Data

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Negative Binomial Mixed Models for Analyzing Longitudinal Microbiome Data
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01683
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinyan Zhang, Yu-Fang Pei, Lei Zhang, Boyi Guo, Amanda H. Pendegraft, Wenzhuo Zhuang, Nengjun Yi

Abstract

The metagenomics sequencing data provide valuable resources for investigating the associations between the microbiome and host environmental/clinical factors and the dynamic changes of microbial abundance over time. The distinct properties of microbiome measurements include varied total sequence reads across samples, over-dispersion and zero-inflation. Additionally, microbiome studies usually collect samples longitudinally, which introduces time-dependent and correlation structures among the samples and thus further complicates the analysis and interpretation of microbiome count data. In this article, we propose negative binomial mixed models (NBMMs) for longitudinal microbiome studies. The proposed NBMMs can efficiently handle over-dispersion and varying total reads, and can account for the dynamic trend and correlation among longitudinal samples. We develop an efficient and stable algorithm to fit the NBMMs. We evaluate and demonstrate the NBMMs method via extensive simulation studies and application to a longitudinal microbiome data. The results show that the proposed method has desirable properties and outperform the previously used methods in terms of flexible framework for modeling correlation structures and detecting dynamic effects. We have developed an R package NBZIMM to implement the proposed method, which is freely available from the public GitHub repository http://github.com//nyiuab//NBZIMM and provides a useful tool for analyzing longitudinal microbiome data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 25%
Mathematics 12 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Environmental Science 9 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,208,975
of 24,093,053 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,659
of 27,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,398
of 333,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#70
of 738 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,093,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 738 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.