↓ Skip to main content

The Genomic Potentials of NOB and Comammox Nitrospira in River Sediment Are Impacted by Native Freshwater Mussels

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Genomic Potentials of NOB and Comammox Nitrospira in River Sediment Are Impacted by Native Freshwater Mussels
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02061
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen M. Black, Craig L. Just

Abstract

Freshwater mussel assemblages of the Upper Mississippi River (UMR) sequester tons of ammonia- and urea-based biodeposits each day and aerate sediment through burrowing activities, thus creating a unique niche for nitrogen (N) cycling microorganisms. This study explored how mussels impact the abundance of N-cycling species with an emphasis on Candidatus Nitrospira inopinata, the first microorganism known to completely oxidize ammonia (comammox) to nitrate. This study used metagenomic shotgun sequencing of genomic DNA to compare nitrogen cycling species in sediment under a well-established mussel assemblage and in nearby sediment without mussels. Metagenomic reads were aligned to the prokaryotic RefSeq non-redundant protein database using BLASTx, taxonomic binning was performed using the weighted lowest common ancestor algorithm, and protein-coding genes were categorized by metabolic function using the SEED subsystem. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect sizes were used to determine which metagenomes and metabolic features explained the most differences between the mussel habitat sediment and sediment without mussels. Of the N-cycling species deemed differentially abundant, Nitrospira moscoviensis and "Candidatus Nitrospira inopinata" were responsible for creating a distinctive N-cycling microbiome in the mussel habitat sediment. Further investigation revealed that comammox Nitrospira had a large metabolic potential to degrade mussel biodeposits, as evidenced the top ten percent of protein-coding genes including the cytochrome c-type biogenesis protein required for hydroxylamine oxidation, ammonia monooxygenase, and urea decomposition SEED subsystems. Genetic marker analysis of these two Nitrospira taxons suggested that N. moscoviensis was most impacted by diverse carbon metabolic processes while "Candidatus Nitrospira inopinata" was most distinguished by multidrug efflux proteins (AcrB), NiFe hydrogenase (HypF) used in hydrogen oxidation and sulfur reduction coupled reactions, and a heme chaperone (CcmE). Furthermore, our research suggests that comammox and NOB Nitrospira likely coexisted by utilizing mixotrophic metabolisms. For example, "Candidatus Nitrospira inopinata" had the largest potentials for ammonia oxidation, nitrite reduction with NirK, and hydrogen oxidation, while NOB Nitrospira had the greatest potential for nitrite oxidation, and nitrate reduction possibly coupled with formate oxidation. Overall, our results suggest that this mussel habitat sediment harbors a niche for NOB and comammox Nitrospira, and ultimately impacts N-cycling in backwaters of the UMR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 29%
Environmental Science 13 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,361,198
of 24,058,913 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4,288
of 27,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,685
of 338,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#180
of 693 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,058,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 693 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.