↓ Skip to main content

Deciphering Resistome and Virulome Diversity in a Porcine Slaughterhouse and Pork Products Through Its Production Chain

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deciphering Resistome and Virulome Diversity in a Porcine Slaughterhouse and Pork Products Through Its Production Chain
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02099
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillermo Campos Calero, Natacha Caballero Gómez, Nabil Benomar, Beatriz Pérez Montoro, Charles W. Knapp, Antonio Gálvez, Hikmate Abriouel

Abstract

We aimed to better understand resistome and virulome patterns on animal and process-area surfaces through a pig slaughterhouse to track possible contamination within the food production chain. Culture-dependent methods revealed high levels of microbial contamination, corresponding to mesophilic and pathogenic bacteria on both the animal and process-area surfaces mainly in the anesthesia (AA and AS) zone followed by "scorching and whip" (FA and FS) zone and also in the end products. To evaluate the potential risk of antibiotic resistance and virulence determinants, shotgun metagenomic DNA-sequencing of isolates from selected areas/products uncovered a high diversity and richness of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs): 55-62 genes in the anesthesia area (AA and AS) and 35-40 in "animal-arrival zone" (MA and MS). The "scorching and whip" (FA and FS) area, however, exhibited lowered abundance of ARGs (1-6), indicating that the scalding and depilating process (an intermediate zone between "anesthesia" and "scorching and whip") significantly decreased bacterial load by 1-3 log10 but also diminished the resistome. The high prevalence of antibiotic-inactivating enzyme genes in the "animal-arrival zone" (60-65%) and "anesthesia" area (56%) were mainly represented by those for aminoglycoside (46-51%) and lincosamide (14-19%) resistance, which did not reflect selective pressures by antibiotics most commonly used in pig therapy-tetracyclines and beta-lactams. Contrary to ARGs, greater number of virulence resistance genes were detected after evisceration in some products such as kidney, which reflected the poor hygienic practices. More than 19 general virulence features-mainly adherence, secretion system, chemotaxis and motility, invasion and motility were detected in some products. However, immune evasion determinants were detected in almost all samples analyzed from the beginning of the process, with highest amounts found from the anesthesia area. We conclude that there are two main sources of contamination in a pig slaughterhouse: the microorganisms carried on the animals' hide, and those from the evisceration step. As such, focussing control measures, e.g., enhanced disinfection procedures, on these contamination-source areas may reduce risks to food safety and consumer health, since the antibiotic and virulence determinants may spread to end products and the environment; further, ARG and virulence traits can exacerbate pathogen treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Lecturer 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 22 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2018.
All research outputs
#19,768,684
of 25,168,110 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#20,185
of 28,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,730
of 343,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#502
of 700 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,168,110 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 700 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.