The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Screening of Phytophagous and Xylophagous Insects Guts Microbiota Abilities to Degrade Lignocellulose in Bioreactor
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02222 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amandine Gales, Lucile Chatellard, Maider Abadie, Anaïs Bonnafous, Lucas Auer, Hélène Carrère, Jean-Jacques Godon, Guillermina Hernandez-Raquet, Claire Dumas |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 25% |
Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
Researcher | 6 | 14% |
Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 16% |
Unknown | 12 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 33% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 12% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 7% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,915,648
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,613
of 25,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,477
of 344,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#97
of 680 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 680 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.